Distal Versus Proximal Radial Arterial Access for Percutaneous Coronary Angiography and Intervention: Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Radial artery occlusion (RAO) is a major impediment to reintervention in patients who underwent proximal transradial access (p-TRA) for coronary catheterization. Distal transradial access (d-TRA) at the level of snuffbox distal to the radial artery bifurcation is a novel alternative to p-TRA. We conducted an updated meta-analysis of all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the incidence of RAO between p-TRA and d-TRA, along with access site-related complications. PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for RCTs published since 2017 to October 2023 comparing d-TRA and p-TRA for coronary angiography and/or intervention. Risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the random-effects model for procedural and clinical outcomes for the 2 approaches. A total of 18 RCTs with 8,205 patients (d-TRA n = 4,096, p-TRA n = 4,109) were included. The risk of RAO (RR 0.31, 0.21 to 0.46, p ≤0.001) and time to hemostasis (minutes) (MD -51.18, -70.62 to -31.73, p <0.001) was significantly lower in the d-TRA group. Crossover rates (RR 2.39, 1.71 to 3.32, p <0.001), access time (minutes) (MD 0.93, 0.50 to 1.37, p <0.001), procedural pain (MD 0.46, 0.13 to 0.79, p = 0.006), and multiple puncture attempts (RR 2.13, 1.10 to 4.11, p = 0.03) were significantly higher in the d-TRA group. The use of d-TRA for coronary angiography and/or intervention is associated with a lower risk of RAO at the forearm and may preserve p-TRA site for reintervention in selective patients by reducing the incidence of RAO.

Comparison of long-term radial artery occlusion via distal vs. conventional transradial access (CONDITION): a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The distal transradial access (dTRA) has become an attractive and alternative access to the conventional transradial access (TRA) for cardiovascular interventional diagnosis and/or treatment. There was a lack of randomized clinical trials to evaluate the effect of the dTRA on the long-term radial artery occlusion (RAO). METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized controlled study. The primary endpoint was the incidence of long-term RAO at 3 months after discharge. The secondary endpoints included the successful puncture rate, puncture time, and other access-related complications. RESULTS: The incidence of long-term RAO was 0.8% (3/361) for dTRA and 3.3% (12/365) for TRA (risk ratio = 0.25, 95% confidence interval = 0.07-0.88, P = 0.02). The incidence of RAO at 24 h was significantly lower in the dTRA group than in the TRA group (2.5% vs. 6.7%, P < 0.01). The puncture success rate (96.0% vs. 98.5%, P = 0.03) and single puncture attempt (70.9% vs. 83.9%, P < 0.01) were significantly lower in the dTRA group than in the TRA group. However, the number of puncture attempts and puncture time were higher in the dTRA group. The dTRA group had a lower incidence of bleeding than the TRA group (1.5% vs. 6.0%, P < 0.01). There was no difference in the success rate of the procedure, total fluoroscopy time, or incidence of other access-related complications between the two groups. In the per-protocol analysis, the incidence of mEASY type ≥ II haematoma was significantly lower in the dTRA group, which was consistent with that in the as-treated analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The dTRA significantly reduced the incidence of long-term RAO, bleeding or haematoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifer: NCT05253820.

Incidence and Outcomes of Visceral Ischemia in Acute Aortic Occlusion.

BACKGROUND: Acute aortic occlusion (AAO) is a morbid diagnosis in which mortality correlates with severity of ischemia on presentation. Visceral ischemia (VI) is challenging to diagnose and its presentation as a consequence of AAO is not well-studied. We aim to identify characteristics associated with VI in AAO to facilitate diagnosis. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with AAO who underwent revascularization were identified retrospectively from institutional records (2006-2020). The primary outcome was the development of VI (intra-abdominal ischemia). Univariate analysis was used to compare demographic, exam, imaging, and intraoperative variables between patients with and without VI in the setting of AAO. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients were included. The prevalence of VI was 20.9%. Preoperative comorbidities, time to revascularization, and operative approach did not differ between patients with and without VI. Patients with VI more frequently were transferred from outside institutions (100% vs. 53%, P = 0.02), presented with advanced acute limb ischemia (Rutherford III 36.9% vs. 7.5%, P < 0.01), and had elevated preoperative serum lactate (4.31 vs. 2.41 mmol/L, P < 0.01). VI patients had an increased occurrence of bilateral internal iliac artery (IIA) occlusion (47.4% vs. 18.1%, P = 0.01). Unilateral IIA occlusion, level of aortic occlusion, and patency of inferior mesenteric arteries were not associated with VI. Patients with VI had worse postoperative outcomes. In particular, VI conferred significant risk of mortality (odds ratio 5.45, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Visceral ischemia is a common consequence of AAO. Elevated lactate, bilateral IIA occlusion, and advanced acute limb ischemia (ALI) should increase clinical suspicion for concomitant VI with AAO and may facilitate earlier diagnosis to improve outcomes.

Rationale and Design of the Rivaroxaban Post-Transradial Access for the Prevention of Radial Artery Occlusion Trial (CAPITAL-RAPTOR).

INTRODUCTION: Transradial access (TRA) has rapidly emerged as the preferred vascular access site for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention. Radial artery occlusion (RAO) remains as an important complication of TRA as it precludes future ipsilateral transradial procedures. While intraprocedural anticoagulation has been studied extensively, the definitive role of postprocedural anticoagulation has not yet been established. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Rivaroxaban Post-Transradial Access for the Prevention of Radial Artery Occlusion trial is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint design study investigating the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban to reduce the incidence of RAO. Eligible patients will undergo randomisation to receive either rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily for 7 days or to no additional postprocedural anticoagulation. Doppler ultrasound to assess radial artery patency will be performed at 30 days. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by the Ottawa Health Science Network Research Ethics Board (approval number 20180319-01H). The study results will be disseminated via conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03630055.

Evaluation of the Risk Factors for Cellulitis among Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease.

Background and objectives: The objective of this study is to elucidate peripheral occlusion artery disease (PAOD) as a risk factor for cellulitis. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective population-based cohort study. The database is the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database, which covers two million beneficiaries from the entire population of the 2010 registry for beneficiaries in Taiwan. The PAOD group is composed of patients who were newly diagnosed with PAOD from 2001 to 2014. The non-PAOD group is composed of patients who were never diagnosed with PAOD from 2001 to 2015. All patients were followed until the onset of cellulitis, death, or until the end of 2015. Results: Finally, 29,830 patients who were newly diagnosed with PAOD were included in the PAOD group, and 29,830 patients who were never diagnosed with PAOD were included in the non-PAOD group. The incidence densities (ID) of cellulitis were 26.05 (95% CI = 25.31-26.80) patients per 1000 person-years in the PAOD group and 49.10 (95% CI = 48.04-50.19) in the non-PAOD group. The PAOD group had an increased risk of cellulitis (adjusted HR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.87-2.01) compared to the non-PAOD group. Conclusions: Patients with PAOD were associated with a higher risk of subsequent cellulitis compared to patients without PAOD.

Effect of Duration of Hemostatic Compression on Radial Artery Occlusion after Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Radial artery occlusion (RAO) is now a major concern in transradial approach (TRA). RAO limits future radial artery use for further TRA, for as a conduit during CABG, for invasive hemodynamic monitoring and for creation of arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) patients through same vascular approach. The effect of duration of hemostatic compression of RAO is unknown in Bangladesh. This prospective observational study was conducted in the department of Cardiology, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Dhaka, Bangladesh (NICVD) from September 2018 to August 2019, to evaluate the effect of duration of hemostatic compression on the incidence of radial artery occlusion (RAO) after transradial percutaneous coronary intervention. A total of 140 patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) through TRA. RAO was defined as an absence of antegrade flow or monophasic flow or invert flow on Duplex study. In this study 70 patients (Group I) received 2 hours hemostatic compression after transradial PCI. Another 70 patients (Group II) received 6 hours hemostatic compression after transradial PCI. Radial arterial blood flow assessed at early (24 hours) and late (30 days) by color duplex study after the procedure in both groups. Early radial artery occlusion occurred in 4.3% of patients in Group I and 12.8% of patients in Group II, (p=0.04). Late radial artery occlusion occurred in 2.8% of patients in Group I and 11.4% of patients in Group II, the difference was statistically significant (p=0.04). From multivariate logistic regression analysis duration of hemostatic compression time 6 hours (p=0.01), post-procedural nitroglycerine use (p=0.03) and procedure time (p=0.03) were predictors of RAO. Shorter duration of hemostatic compression is associated with a lower incidence of early and late radial artery occlusion after transradial intervention.

Role of Intra-arterial Nitroglycerin (Post Procedural, Prehemostasis) to Reduce Radial Artery Occlusion after Transradial Catheterisation: A Doppler-guided Study.

The study was intended to evaluate efficacy of Intra-arterial nitroglycerin through the sheath at the end of a transradial procedure to preserve the patency of the radial artery. This prospective observational study was done in the Department of Cardiology, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Dhaka, Bangladesh from May 2017 to April 2018, by including a total 200 patients undergoing coronary procedures (CAG and / or PCI) through TRA. RAO was defined as an absence of antegrade flow or monophasic flow or invert flow on Doppler study. In this study 102 patients (Group I) received 200 mcg intra-arterial nitroglycerine, prior to trans-radial sheath removal. Another 98 patients (Group II) did not receive intra-arterial nitroglycerine prior to trans-radial sheath removal. Conventional haemostatic compression methods were applied (average 2 hours) in both groups of patients. Evaluation of radial arterial arterial blood flow by colour Doppler study was done on next day after the procedure in both groups. Results of this study in which RAO was determined by vascular doppler study showed that frequency of radial artery occlusion were 13.5% one day after transradial coronary procedures. We found the incidence was 8.8% vs. 18.4%, (p=0.04) in Group I and Group II respectively. The incidence of RAO was significantly lower in post procedural nitroglycerine group. From multivariate logistic regression analysis diabetes mellitus (p = 0.02), hemostatic compression time for more than 02 hours after sheath removal (p = <0.001) and procedure time (p = 0.02) was predictors of RAO. So, the administration of nitroglycerin at the end of a transradial catheterization reduced the incidence of RAO, as shown by 1 day after the radial procedure by doppler ultrasound.

Incidence and predictors of radial artery occlusion following transradial coronary angiography: the proRadial trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the contemporary incidence and predictors of radial artery occlusion as well as the effectiveness of antithrombotic treatment for radial artery occlusion following transradial coronary angiography. BACKGROUND: The radial artery is the standard access for coronary angiography and even complex interventions. Postprocedural radial artery occlusion is still a common and significant complication. METHODS: This prospective study enrolled 2004 patients following transradial coronary angiography. After sheath removal, hemostasis was obtained in a standardized fashion. Radial artery patency was evaluated by duplex ultrasonography in all patients. In case of occlusion, oral anticoagulation was recommended and patients were scheduled for a 30-day follow-up including Doppler ultrasonography. RESULTS: A new-diagnosed radial occlusion was found in 4.6% of patients. The strongest independent predictors of radial occlusion were female sex and active smoking status. In the subgroup of patients with percutaneous coronary interventions, female sex followed by sheath size > 6 French were the strongest predictors of radial occlusion. 76 of 93 patients with radial occlusion received an oral anticoagulation for 30 days. However, reperfusion at 30 days was found in 32% of patients on oral anticoagulation. CONCLUSION: The incidence of radial artery occlusion following coronary angiography in contemporary practice appears with 4.6% to be lower as compared to previous cohorts. Female sex and smoking status are the strongest independent predictors of radial occlusion followed by procedural variables. The limited effectiveness of oral anticoagulation for treatment of radial artery occlusion suggests a primarily traumatic than thrombotic mechanism of this complication.

Risk factors and frequency of acute and permanent femoral arterial occlusion in neonates with CHD who undergo ultrasound-guided femoral arterial access.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated frequency and risk factors of acute loss of the arterial pulse and permanent femoral arterial occlusion in neonates with CHD who underwent ultrasound-guided femoral arterial access. METHODS: We divided the patients into groups according to the presence of acute loss of the arterial pulse and permanent femoral arterial occlusion. We obtained data related to patient characteristics and access variables of ultrasound-guided femoral arterial access from our database of cardiac catheterisation between August, 2017 and May, 2021. We used an echocardiography-S6, 12-MHz linear probe, 21-gauge needle, 0.018"guidewire, and a 4F sheath for arterial access. RESULTS: Ultrasound-guided femoral arterial access was obtained in 323 (98.8%) of the 327 neonates. We identified acute loss of the arterial pulse in 130 (40.2%) patients and permanent femoral arterial occlusion in 19 (5.9%) patients. Median weight was 3.05 (Interquartile range (IQR): 2.80-3.40) kg, first attempt success rate was 88.2%, and median access time was 46 sec (IQR: 23-94). Logistic regression analysis identified coarctation of the aorta (odds ratio: 2.46; 95% CI: 1.30-4.66; p = 0.006) as independent risk factor for acute loss of the arterial pulse, but did not identify any independent risk factors for permanent femoral arterial occlusion. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed coarctation of the aorta as an independent risk factor for acute loss of the arterial pulse, but did not identify any independent factors for permanent femoral arterial occlusion in neonates with CHD. Although most cases of acute loss of the arterial pulse resolve in the early period, the frequency of permanent femoral arterial occlusion remains high despite effective treatment.

Incidence, predictors, and impact on outcome of underlying intracranial atherosclerotic disease in acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion undergoing endovascular therapy: Data from ANGEL-ACT registry.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is a common etiology of acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (VBAO) in Asia, which complicated endovascular treatment (EVT). We aimed to investigate the incidence, impacts, and predictors of ICAD in VBAO. METHODS: Subjects were selected from the Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Work Flow Improvement of Acute Ischemic Stroke registry and divided into two groups based on whether underlying ICAD existed. Underlying ICAD was determined when the following situations arise in the occlusion site during EVT: (1) fixed stenosis degree >70% or (2) stenosis >50% with distal blood flow impairment or evidence of repeated reocclusion. Multivariable regression models were used to investigate the effect of underlying ICAD on outcomes measured by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days and to identify baseline characteristics associated with underlying ICAD. RESULTS: Among the 315 patients enrolled, 171 (54.3%) had underlying ICAD. Favorable functional outcomes (mRS 0-3) occurred in 79 of 163 patients (48.5%) with ICAD and 69 of 137 patients (50.4%) without ICAD (p = 0.743). Outcomes were similar between the two groups and remained similar after adjusting for the confounders. History of hypertension and elevated admission neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio were strong predictors of underlying ICAD, whereas history of atrial fibrillation and distal basilar artery occlusion were negative predictors. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, underlying ICAD was recognized in approximately half of the VBAO patients, leading to comparable outcomes after more complex EVT strategies. Some baseline characteristics were identified to be predictors for underlying ICAD, which were helpful to guide the EVT strategies before the procedure.

Radial artery occlusion after transradial procedures: impact on 1-year adverse events.

BACKGROUND: Radial artery occlusion after transradial procedures is a frequent iatrogenic thrombotic process. The impact on prognosis has not been investigated. This study sought to investigate whether radial artery occlusion is related to increased risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, defined as death, myocardial infarction, stroke and coronary revascularization. METHODS: Eight hundred thirty-seven consecutive patients who underwent a transradial coronary procedure had patency of radial artery checked at 24 hours. Radial artery occlusion occurred in 41 over 837 patients (4.8%); 764 (91.2%) were available for planned follow-up at 1 year and were included in the analysis. Event-free survival rate between patients with and without radial artery occlusion was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and Cox proportional-hazards models were used to identify independent risk factors. RESULTS: At a median 370-day follow-up (IQR: 366-375 days), adverse events occurred in 37 patients (4.8%), 2 in patients with radial artery occlusion and 35 in patients without. One-year survival rate was 94.9% vs. 95% (unadjusted HR=1.026, 95% CI: 0.24 to 4.6, P=0.9). After multivariable modeling, age and coronary artery disease extension was associated with increased risk of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Age and coronary artery disease extension were independent predictors of adverse events at follow-up. RAO had no prognostic impact.

Evaluation of the distal radial approach in percutaneous coronary interventions. A controlled, randomized non-inferiority trial.

INTRODUCTION: The conventional radial approach (CRA), the gold standard approach for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), is associated with the risk of radial artery occlusion (RAO). The distal radial approach (DRA) is an effective alternative with fewer complications. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy in terms of puncture success and safety by RAO rate of the DRA in elective PCI in Tunisian patients. METHODS: It was a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial including patients hospitalized for elective PCI. The protocol was previously published (Tunis Med 2022; 100(3): 192-202). The primary endpoints were puncture success and RAO rate at 30 days. RESULTS: Overall, 250 patients were included and the groups were comparable. The preprocedural examination of the radial pulse and the Barbeau test were similar. The majority of PCIs were coronary angiography (82%). In ITT, respectively in CRA versus DRA, puncture success rates were similar (97.6% versus 96.8%; p≤0.500). RAO rates were similar (2.4% versus 3.2%; p≤0.500). Crossovers were similar. PCI through DRA lasted longer but was not more irradiating, however it required more contrast. Overall bleeding and vascular complications were similar. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the non-inferiority of DRA compared to CRA for elective PCIs in a Tunisian population regarding puncture success and RAO rate at 30 days. Multicenter trials including urgent PCI with systematic ultrasound screening for RAO are needed.

The efficacy of nitroglycerin to prevent radial artery spasm and occlusion during and after transradial catheterization: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Radial artery spasm (RAS) is the most common cause of transradial access site crossover and is a common intra-procedural complication. RAS incidence can lead to radial artery occlusion (RAO) postprocedure, preventing the radial artery as a future access site. We evaluated the efficacy of nitroglycerin preventing RAS and RAO during transradial catheterization discussing the different routes of administration, including topical, subcutaneous, and intra-arterial. A systematic review and meta-analysis included all relevant articles until April 23, 2022. We searched six databases Google Scholar, Web of Science, SCOPUS, EMBASE, PubMed (MEDLINE), and CENTRAL. We registered our review protocol in PROSPERO with ID: CRD42022330356. We included 11 trials with 5814 patients. Compared to placebo, the pooled analysis favored subcutaneous nitroglycerin in preventing RAS (risk ratio [RR]: 0.57 with 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.43-0.77], p = .0003) and RAO (RR: 0.39 with 95% CI [0.16-0.98], p = .05). In contrast to the intra-arterial nitroglycerin that showed nonstatistically significant results in preventing RAS and RAO (RR: 0.8 with 95% CI [0.63-1.02], p = .07)- (RR: 0.78 with 95% CI [0.6-1.01], p = .06)), respectively. Also, topical nitroglycerin did not prevent RAS (RR: 0.73 with 95% CI [0.42-1.24], p = .24). Compared with placebo, subcutaneous nitroglycerin during transradial catheterization reduced the incidence of RAS and RAO. Meanwhile, Intra-arterial and topical nitroglycerin did not show statistically significant outcomes. Subcutaneous nitroglycerin may be a practical and cost-effective technique to facilitate transradial catheterization; however, more RCTs are needed to evaluate the subcutaneous versus intra-arterial nitroglycerin administration.

Efficacy and Safety of Coronary Intervention via Distal Transradial Access (dTRA) in Patients with Low Body Mass Index.

The study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of coronary intervention via distal transradial access (dTRA) in patients with low body mass index (BMI). A total of 67 patients with low BMI who underwent coronary intervention, comprising 29 patients via dTRA and 38 patients via conventional transradial access (cTRA), were retrospectively included. There was no significant difference in the puncture success rate between the two groups (dTRA 96.6%, cTRA 97.4%, P=0.846). Compared with the cTRA group, the success rate of one-needle puncture in the dTRA group was lower (51.7% vs. 81.6%, P=0.020). The compression haemostasis time in the dTRA group was shorter than that in the cTRA group (P < 0.001). However, the incidence of radial artery occlusion was lower in the dTRA group than in the cTRA group (4.0% vs. 33.3%, P=0.007). In conclusion, coronary intervention via dTRA was safe and effective in patients with low BMI.

Risk of peripheral artery occlusive disease in patients with lower leg fracture who received fixation and non-fixation treatments: A population cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The risk of peripheral artery occlusive disease (PAOD) in patients with lower leg fracture who underwent fixation procedures is not yet completely understood. Therefore, the current study aimed to examine the risk of subsequent PAOD in patients with lower leg fracture who received fixation and non-fixation treatments. METHODS: We included 6538 patients with lower leg fracture who received non-fixation treatment and a matched cohort comprising 26152 patients who received fixation treatment from the National Health Insurance Database. Patients were frequency matched according to age, sex, and index year. The incidence and risk of PAOD in patients with lower leg fracture who received fixation and non-fixation treatments were evaluated via the stratification of different characteristics and comorbidities. RESULTS: Non-fixation treatment, male sex, older age (≥ 50 years old), diabetes mellitus, and gout were associated with a significantly higher risk of lower extremity PAOD compare to each comparison group, respectively. Moreover, there was a significant correlation between fixation treatment and a lower risk of lower extremity PAOD in women (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.38-0.90), women aged > 50 years (aHR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.38-0.96), and patients with coronary artery disease (aHR = 0.43, 95% CI = (0.23-0.81). Further, patients with fixation treatment had a significantly lower risk of lower extremity PAOD within 2 years after trauma (aHR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.34-0.97). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the cumulative incidence of PAOD was significantly higher in the non-fixation treatment group than in the fixation treatment group at the end of the 10-year follow-up period (log-rank test: P = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Patients with lower leg fracture who received non-fixation treatment had a significantly higher risk of PAOD than those who received fixation treatment. Moreover, the risk of PAOD was higher in women aged > 50 years, as well as in coronary artery disease patients who received non-fixation treatment than in those who received fixation treatment. Therefore, regular assessment of vessel patency are recommended for these patients. Nevertheless, further studies must be conducted to validate the results of our study.

Evaluation of the incidence of radial artery occlusion using different introducer sheaths and hemostasis techniques.

BACKGROUND: Radial artery occlusion (RAO) remains one of the most important complications of transradial access (TRA). Despite the identification of multiple predictors, the interaction between these predictors on the occurrence of RAO has not been evaluated. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing TRA coronary angiography (CA) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), were retrospectively analyzed to compare the effect of standard patent hemostasis using a one-bladder band versus two-bladder band with simultaneous ipsilateral ulnar artery compression and two introducer sizes on the primary endpoint of RAO. Access was obtained using 6-Fr slender introducer sheath or 7-Fr slender introducer sheath and hemostasis with either a one-bladder band or a two-bladder band. The radial artery was evaluated using ultrasound. RESULTS: Total of 2019 patients undergoing CA or PCI were included in the analysis. In the one-bladder band group, the incidence of RAO with a 6-Fr slender introducer sheath was 4.2%. In those receiving hemostasis with a two-bladder band, RAO occurred in 1% of patients receiving a 6-Fr slender introducer sheath versus 0.9% in those receiving a 7-Fr slender introducer sheath (p = 0.68). Larger radial artery diameter, larger body weight, and a two-bladder hemostasis band with ipsilateral ulnar compression were independently associated with a lower incidence of RAO. CONCLUSION: A two-bladder band with simultaneous ipsilateral ulnar artery compression when used for radial artery hemostasis, is associated with a lower incidence of RAO, and can mitigate the penalty for a larger catheter with reassuring implications for use of a 7-Fr capable system for complex transradial PCI.

The In-Hospital Care of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease.

BACKGROUND: Studies from Denmark and the USA have shown differences in treatment outcomes for patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) between hospitals of different size and certification status. For Germany, it is not known whether certification as a specialist center for vascular diseases or hospital size is associated with differences in the primary treatment outcome. METHODS: Using data from the German Federal Statistical Office, all hospitalizations due to PAOD of Fontaine stage IIb or higher were included in our study and the hospitals were classified according to their size and certification status. PAOD stage, age, sex, and comorbidities were documented for each hospitalization. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to identify independent variables that predict various treatment endpoints. RESULTS: A total of 558 785 hospitalizations were included for analysis, of which 29% were in hospitals with certified vascular centers. In multivariate analysis, admissions to certified hospitals were associated with lower rates of major amputation (odds ratio [OR] 0.95, 95% confidence interval [0.92; 0.98], p = 0.003) and higher rates of minor amputation (OR 1.04 [1.01; 1.06], p = 0.004) with no difference observed in mortality (OR 0.99 [0.96; 1.03], p = 0.791). Admissions to larger hospitals were associated with more comorbidities, longer hospital stays, and higher rates of mortality and amputations. CONCLUSION: Treatments in certified hospitals are associated with fewer major and more minor amputations. This may reflect intensification of therapy targeting preservation of functional limbs.

COVID-19-related Peripheral Arterial Thrombosis Treated in a Large Health Maintenance Organization.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 was initially identified as an acute respiratory disease, but it was quickly recognized that multiple organ systems could be affected. Venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism have been well reported. However, there is a paucity of data on COVID-19-related arterial thrombosis. We examined the incidence, characteristics, treatment, and outcome in patients with acute COVID-19-related arterial thrombosis in a large health maintenance organization (HMO). METHODS: A retrospective multicenter case review was performed from March 2020 to March 2021. Cases were identified through a questionnaire sent to vascular surgeons. Patient characteristics, imaging, treatment, and outcome were reviewed. Successful revascularization was defined as restoration of blood flow with viability of the end organ and absence of death within 30 days. Limb salvage was defined as prevention of major amputation (transtibial or transfemoral) and absence of death in 30 days. RESULTS: There were 37,845 patients admitted with COVID-19 complications during this time. Among this group, 26 patients (0.07%) had COVID-19-related arterial thrombosis. The mean age was 61.7 years (range, 33-82 years) with 20 men (77%) and 6 women (23%). Ethnic minorities comprised 25 of 26 cases (96%). Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) was present in 4 of 26 (15%), active smoking in 1 of 26 (3.8%), and diabetes in 19 of 26 (73%) cases. Most patients developed acute arterial ischemia in the outpatient setting, 20 of 26 (77%). Of the outpatients, 6 of 20 (30%) had asymptomatic COVID-19 and 14 of 20 (70%) had only mild upper respiratory symptoms. Distribution of ischemia was as follows: 23 patients had at least one lower extremity ischemia, one patient had cerebral and lower extremity, one had mesenteric and lower extremity, and one had upper extremity ischemia. Revascularization was attempted in 21 patients, of which 12 of 21 (57%) were successful. Limb salvage was successful in 13 of 26 (50%) patients. The overall mortality was 31% (8/26). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience in a large HMO revealed that the incidence of COVID-19-related arterial thrombosis was low. The actual incidence is likely to be higher since our method of case collection was incomplete. The majority of arterial thrombosis occurred in the outpatient setting in patients with asymptomatic or mild/moderate COVID-19 respiratory disease. Acute ischemia was the inciting factor for hospitalization in these cases. Acute lower extremity ischemia was the most common presentation, and limb salvage rate was lower than that expected when compared to ischemia related to PAD. Arterial thrombosis associated with COVID-19 portends a significantly higher mortality. Education of primary care providers is paramount to prevent delayed diagnosis as most patients initially developed ischemia in the outpatient setting and did not have a high cardiovascular risk profile.

Treating Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease and Acute Limb Ischemia During a COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020.

BACKGROUND: For many surgeons the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 meant a downscaling of surgical interventions. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the measures taken on the care for patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAOD) and acute limb ischemia (ALI). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the vascular practices of 2 major teaching hospitals in the Netherlands was performed. All interventions and outpatient visits for PAOD or ALI in 2020 were included. Patients treated in 2018 and 2019 were to serve as a control group. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: In 2020, a total of 1513 procedures were performed for PAOD or ALI. This did not differ significantly from previous years. Overall, Fontaine 2 and 4 were the most frequent indications for intervention. A significant increase in the number of major amputations was observed in 2020 compared to 2018 (P< 0.01). This was mainly due to patients suffering from PAOD Fontaine 4. Inversely, a reduction in the number of femoro-popliteal bypasses was observed between 2020 and 2018. The number of outpatient visit due to Fontaine 2 was significantly lower in 2020 compared to 2018. CONCLUSIONS: The vascular practices of our hospitals were minimally influenced by the measures taken due to the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2. There was an increase in the number of amputation but an enormous surge in patients presenting with critical limb ischemia was not observed.

Factors influencing radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary intervention in the Indian population.

OBJECTIVE: Radial artery occlusion (RAO) is a common complication during transradial coronary intervention. Its incidence is variably reported in literature and its predictors are not completely understood. In this study, we aimed to define the incidence and factors influencing RAO in patients undergoing transradial coronary intervention. METHODS: This was a single-center prospective study (October 2018 to September 2019) that enrolled 1,754 patients who were evaluated for RAO 24 hours after transradial coronary intervention. Univariate as well as multivariate analyses were done to identify patient and procedure related factors predicting the occurrence of RAO. RESULTS: A total of 1,374 patients (78.3%) underwent angioplasty, whereas 380 (21.7%) underwent angiography alone. RAO was diagnosed in 11.97% patients. Lower glomerular filtration rate, multiple puncture attempts for radial artery access, larger sheath size, complex nature of interventional procedure, longer homeostasis time, and forearm hematoma formation were independent predictors for RAO. CONCLUSION: RAO was not an uncommon complication in transradial coronary interventions, especially in the Indian population; and the knowledge of predictors may be helpful in its prevention.